Hello Everyone
Friday, July 19, 2013
VLC is back in the App Store
Thursday, July 18, 2013
Why is it so hard for some studios to produce good packaging?
Some studios put DVDs in "books" with scratch-causing cardboard sleeves. Other studios stack discs in a spindle. And then there are others with a good idea, but execute it poorly.
An example of a poorly executed idea, are the Dragon Balls DVD season sets. The spines create Shenron in all it's glory, but only if you remove the partially embossed slipcovers.
It makes no sense why someone would produce a design like this that can only be seen if you get rid of part of the packaging (a part that a lot of people like keeping on).
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Google Maps on iPad
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Why I ditched the Disney Movie Club
Monday, July 08, 2013
Why 3D is a waste of money
Unlike what Hollywood tries to pawn off on a misinformed consumer, 3D technology is nothing new. The first 3D film I saw was in 1990, I was 10 years old and on a family trip to Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida. In one of the Disney theaters, I was presented with a 3D short film. The visuals were spectacular; Goofy was only inches from my face. It felt like if I reached out, that I could actually touch the characters.
Now fast forward 23 years to the present, 3D movies in comparison are terrible. Take The Avengers for example, released last year. In a movie lasting 143 minutes, only 10 seconds of it could actually be considered 3D. The rest of the movie was simply holographic. Think back to a holographic baseball card you may have had as a kid, or even the holographic image glued to the slipcover of the 3D Blu-ray for The Avengers; it shows depth, but you can still tell it's a flat card. That's all the movie shows, depth, with the occasional "jump off the screen" moment. Each scene that showed any true 3D laster a 1/2 second, spread throughout the movie, it adds up to about 10 seconds in total. Despite the movie being mainly holographic, it wasn't entirely. Toward the end of the movie, when you see reactions on the TV, that's a flat shot. No holographic effects at all. Then in the following scene when everyone is standing by their cars, we go back to the holographic imagery. In Coraline (2009) this happens quite often. The so-called "3D" is turned off so much, that it feels like a 2D movie.
Why are people paying extra for a mediocre experience, one that is over 20 years old? Since Hollywood was losing theater viewership for the more comfortable and personal home theater experience, they decided to pull an old technology off the shelf, blow the dust away, and pretend it's new. But it's not new, instead they took an old technology and made it even worse. The 3D movie I saw 23 years ago is far superior to the junk Hollywood is producing today. And people are paying a premium to get ripped off. That's why when I had a choice between a reasonably high ticket price to see Iron Man 3 in 2D or an outrageous ticket price to see Iron Man 3 in 3D, I choose the 2D version. Not just for the price, but also because I knew I'd get a better viewing experience in 2D than I would in the faux 3D.
The reason Hollywood is producing junk these days, is because they spend more time and money putting everything in 3D than they do coming up with a good story. Despite high box office results, the Transformers movies sucked. They do, you can admit it. The old cartoon from the 1980s was good, so what happened? More focus was on the special effects and cutting deals with Chevy, than they were with having a good plot and telling Chevy NO, Bumblebee is NOT a Camaro, he is a Volkswagen Beetle! Consumers have more voting power than they think, and they cast their vote with their dollars. If you want better movies, instead of junky 3D flicks, stop spending money on this 3D nonsense.
Wednesday, July 03, 2013
Amazon.com needs to step up their game with the customer support
I called last week to ask if an order I made back in May was in stock, because I was concerned that the status hasn't changed to "preparing to ship" yet. A woman named "Andrika H" said she checked the stock and assured me that the item would arrive by July 3rd.
It's now July 3rd, and not only did the item not ship, but I just received an email a few minutes ago telling me the order was cancelled.
Hello,
Due to a lack of availability, we will not be able to obtain the following item(s) from your order:
Watsuki, Nobuhiro "Rurouni Kenshin, Vol. 4, Vizbig Edition"
Watsuki, Nobuhiro "Rurouni Kenshin, Vol. 7, Vizbig Edition"
We've canceled the item(s) and apologize for the inconvenience. We must also apologize for the length of time it has taken us to reach this conclusion.
Why does it take two months to decide that you can't get an item? I could say well hey, everyone makes mistakes. But when customer support tells me one week prior to the delivery that it would arrive on time, and then it doesn't... There is no excuse for that. This isn't the first time Amazon has wronged me. They've sold me a counterfeit product in the past, not some 3rd-party merchant, but Amazon themselves. I've also been denied a legitimate Amazon Associates payment a few months back. I don't know what is wrong with Amazon lately, but their customer support sucks!
Tuesday, July 02, 2013
Siri knows stories!
I was testing the volume of Siri and asked her to tell me a story, and she told me one...
Siri is pretty entertaining =)



